No problem 3rdgen.
Has anyone got round to sending the memo to Angus Stewart yet, please?
Posted on previous page..
sorry i have to remain completely anonymous about this but you will see why.
i have first hand knowledge that geoffrey jackson of the governing body is staying with his parents in toowoomba, queensland for the next few weeks.
he has already been in australia for a couple of weeks.
No problem 3rdgen.
Has anyone got round to sending the memo to Angus Stewart yet, please?
Posted on previous page..
sorry i have to remain completely anonymous about this but you will see why.
i have first hand knowledge that geoffrey jackson of the governing body is staying with his parents in toowoomba, queensland for the next few weeks.
he has already been in australia for a couple of weeks.
sorry i have to remain completely anonymous about this but you will see why.
i have first hand knowledge that geoffrey jackson of the governing body is staying with his parents in toowoomba, queensland for the next few weeks.
he has already been in australia for a couple of weeks.
Good call 3rdgen. Here it is:
"Even more inappropriately, the official 1993 telememo form used by elders asked the question "How many elders felt that the victim was somewhat at fault or willingly participated in the acts?"
ww.jwfacts.com/pdf/child-abuse-watchtower-telememo-1993.pdf
Will someone please email this memo to Angus Stewart?
watching the royal commission videos from day 6.. the head of the australian branch is such a liar.
he keeps saying they have the right to make decisions and regulations if they are in accordance with the scriptures, but we all know this is such a lie!!!!.
he is just trying to protect the gb members from bring forced to testify!!
Paradise beauty, would you consider emailing the quote you made from Spinks, along with my posts, to Angus Stewart? :
Thank you.
The person who decides the rules that must be followed by those lower down the hierarchy, has the ultimate responsibility for the results of those procedures..
(I think it's important to point out publically that the application of so-called scripturally based policies needs to be decided by the GB, not the branch. To discuss real changes, they need to talk to the Governing Body.)
sorry i have to remain completely anonymous about this but you will see why.
i have first hand knowledge that geoffrey jackson of the governing body is staying with his parents in toowoomba, queensland for the next few weeks.
he has already been in australia for a couple of weeks.
"It's made it possible for them to select a different GB member who isn't under the same strain as Jackson."
Can somebody please tell me whether the Royal Commission has the power to subpoena another member of the GB??
Jackson is the only australian GB member on Aussie soil.. I hope they haven't passed up their only chance to get a member of the GB to take the stand..
sorry i have to remain completely anonymous about this but you will see why.
i have first hand knowledge that geoffrey jackson of the governing body is staying with his parents in toowoomba, queensland for the next few weeks.
he has already been in australia for a couple of weeks.
He's technically right, the GB don't do admin work or implement anything at the local level..
I've come up with a line of reasoning on another thread to maybe help cut through the BS..
Any refinements or suggestions more than welcome :)
watching the royal commission videos from day 6.. the head of the australian branch is such a liar.
he keeps saying they have the right to make decisions and regulations if they are in accordance with the scriptures, but we all know this is such a lie!!!!.
he is just trying to protect the gb members from bring forced to testify!!
I hope you left out the 'bring in Geoffrey jackson' part.. ;)
Seriously, thank you. I hope it made sense and they consider the line of reasoning.
I don't always come across as I mean to.
(The Governing Body would have had to read and approve the infamous letter about reappointing child molesters,wouldn't they? I'm wondering if I'm right about the letters now..)
watching the royal commission videos from day 6.. the head of the australian branch is such a liar.
he keeps saying they have the right to make decisions and regulations if they are in accordance with the scriptures, but we all know this is such a lie!!!!.
he is just trying to protect the gb members from bring forced to testify!!
watching the royal commission videos from day 6.. the head of the australian branch is such a liar.
he keeps saying they have the right to make decisions and regulations if they are in accordance with the scriptures, but we all know this is such a lie!!!!.
he is just trying to protect the gb members from bring forced to testify!!
watching the royal commission videos from day 6.. the head of the australian branch is such a liar.
he keeps saying they have the right to make decisions and regulations if they are in accordance with the scriptures, but we all know this is such a lie!!!!.
he is just trying to protect the gb members from bring forced to testify!!
Also, can someone please suggest to the RC that they ask the bethel head something along the lines of..
"Did the Governing Body have to approve the material contained in the Shepherd the Flock book (latest elders manual), before it could be distributed to overseers in the various congregations? *Yes*
And do the elders have to follow the instructions contained in this book, including the procedure for dealing with incidents of Child abuse? *Yes*
Does the same apply to confidential letters already submitted, that concern how to deal with those accused of committing child abuse? Did the Governing Body have to read and approve those as well, before they were sent out as instructions to the elders?
Then the Governing Body are responsible for setting the procedure for dealing with child abuse within the organisation.
Bring in Geoffrey Jackson!! "
Seriously, can someone make a suggestion like this?
My emails are monitored by my parents, I don't have the guts to email the RC.